There are
900,000 cases of misdiagnosed attention-deficit disorder according to a study
by Todd Elder. Elder’s study, published
in the Journal of Health Economics, looked at a child’s age in
comparison to his peers to measure the likelihood of an attention-deficit
disorder diagnosis. Elder states, “If a child is behaving poorly, if he's inattentive, if he
can't sit still, it may simply be because he's 5 and the other kids are 6".
Elder used a sample of nearly 12,000
children to examine if age plays a role in the diagnosis and medication rates
between the oldest and youngest children in each grade. He determined a child’s age using data from
the Early
Childhood Longitudinal Study Kindergarten Cohort where he compared the children’s birthdates
with the school’s cut-off date for that grade level. His research found that the youngest children
were 60 percent more likely to receive an attention-deficit disorder diagnosis
than the oldest children in that same grade level. The youngest children were also twice as
likely to be prescribed stimulants.
Studies like this highlight
that we still have a long way to go in identifying and treating
attention-deficit disorder. I am
personally shocked that a teacher’s opinion on whether or a not a child has
attention-deficit disorder plays such a big role in diagnosis. I think this reminds us that even experts can
make mistakes so it is important to remember to seek second opinions and
consider environmental factors before prescribing drugs to children.
No comments:
Post a Comment